Monday, March 23, 2020

Alaska

I have never been to Alaska, and probably never will go, since it's out of the way, expensive, would require a lot of time and is not especially high on my personal desirability list. But if circumstances were to occur which allowed me to go there on favorable terms I would certainly be interested.


1. Tongass National Forest, on the southeast coast. "Visitors spend their vacations there camping, canoeing, skating, and hiking."




This is the largest National Forest in the United States. It covers most of that southern panhandle of the state that is adjacent to Canada. I would assume the majority of it is accessible only to the more rugged and self-sufficient types of outdoorsmen, though most of the park's annual one million official visitors arrive via cruise ship.




2. Chugach National Forest, near Prince William Sound in the south. "A vacation spot".




This place appears to be best known for having a larger population of bald eagles than all of the lower 48 states combined, and for its paucity of roads and trails.



3. Mount McKinley National Park, in central Alaska, 123 miles from Fairbanks. "Second in size to Yellowstone National Park in the United States."


The name of the mountain was officially (and somewhat controversially) changed to Denali by Barack Obama in 2015, though the park itself was apparently renamed Denali National Park as far back as 1980. The park is larger than the entire state of New Hampshire. Receives around 600,000 visitors a year. The name change caught me off guard so I've continued to call it Mt McKinley, which evokes a picture and a meaning in my mind, while Denali doesn't signify anything.


4. Glacier Bay National Monument, near Juneau. "Made up of vast and magnificent glaciers, which can be seen from a plane or a boat."


Upgraded to a National Park by Jimmy Carter in 1980. Received 597,000 visitors last year (Mt McKinley got 594,000. One would imagine that global warming would be totally decimating this park but it is not clear that that is the case. The ice in the bay retreated 48 miles between 1794 and 1879, and "in general, the...glaciers in the park have been thinning and slowly receding over the last several decades", though one is stable and another is actually advancing.


5. Child's Glacier, in the northeast, near Copper River. "A magnificent ice cliff, 200 to 300 feet high, about as high as the Capitol Building in Washington."


This appears to be part of the Chugach National Forest (#2 above) which is decidedly not in the northeast. This is also near the Copper River, so I don't think the encyclopedia is referring to another Child's Glacier.


6. Sitka National Monument, in Southeast Alaska. "Contains an Indian stockade 150 years old."

Redesignated as a National Historic Park in 1972. Looks interesting. There was a battle fought there in 1804 and it was the site of a Russian trading post/fort as well.


7. Kasaan National Monument, on Prince Wales Island. "Contains the ruins of the former Haida Indian Village; one can see totem poles, Indian grave houses, and monuments that are very old."


This place was actually removed from the National Park System in 1955, and is now known as Chief Son-I-Hat's Whale House and Totems Historic District. It is located in the far southeast arm of the state, which largely consists of islands, and is I gather pretty remote, as in, you can't drive there from the outside world at all.
8. Katmai National Monument, in the southwest. "Contains the famous Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes, filled with volcanoes from which pour forth great columns of white vapor."

Upgraded to a National Park in 1980. This one looks like a pretty big deal to me, but it only received around 37,000 visitors in 2015, the last year for which records are available, I presume because of its location. The pictures of it are spectacular.
9. Chief Shakes' Community House, on Wrangell Island, in the southeast. "Contains a fascinating collection of household tools and works of art of the Tlingit Indians."
The house is actually a reproduction, but this place, like most of the others in this state, looks like it would be fun to visit. It seems like the expense of getting to most of these sights would make a tour of them pretty prohibitive for the average person.
 10. Yukon Trail, in Central Alaska. "The famous path taken by the miners in the gold rush almost sixty (now over 120) years ago"


Now known as the Chilkoot Trail, it appears to be part of the Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park. Wikipedia states that it is a popular hiking trail and has placed limits on the numbers of hikers that can be on it at any given time.


11. White Pass and Chilkoot Pass, near Skagway, in the southeast. "Dangerous mountain trails taken by the miners into the Yukon Territory."
These are also in the Klondike Gold Rush Park. I think the Yukon Trail (#10) may refer to something else, but I cannot figure what using current search methods. This Alaska article is probably going to be one of the least profuse in the way of commentary, as it is so far away and I don't know anything or even have any pre-conceptions about most of the sites listed here.


12. Richardson Highway, "a beautiful highway between Valdez and Fairbanks, along which can be seen the deserted towns known as 'ghost towns', once filled with miners seeking gold."
Now this is more my kind of attraction, a 368 mile drive (the first major road built in Alaska, in several stages, finished in more or less its current state by 1950).


13. Metlakatla, on an island in the southeast. "A cooperative Indian village, where everything is owned by the people, including the great sawmill, and their canning and boat-building industries."
This is not a museum, but an actual Indian reservation where people live, though it is a place tourists visit. I would probably find it interesting enough, I'm sure.

14. Ward's Cove, near Ketchikan, in the southeast. "An excellent place for hunting bear and deer."
Hunting large animals was still a mainstream enough activity in the 60s to be promoted in a kids' encyclopedia as an exciting travel opportunity.
15. Mitkof Island, about 100 miles from Juneau. "Mink and fox-raising."
This is the 30th largest island in the United States. Lodging is supposed to be reasonable compared to elsewhere in Alaska. It looks like the main town (population 3,000) has two bars. I'm good to go.












Monday, March 9, 2020

March 2020

A List: T H White--The Once and Future King...…………….………….180/639
B List: Charles Dickens--Bleak House...…………………………………213/880
C List: David Mitchell--Cloud Atlas...…………………………………...434/509


A lot of long books right now that are taking me a while to get through because I have too many other things to do all the time, though obviously very good ones. However I must admit that I have still not been able to get into The Once and Future King much. There is a mixture of extensive practical details and the author's esoteric and episodes of people being transformed into birds and such that I have to say has not been able to hold my fascination thus far, as it is. It is entirely possible that this has happened to come up at the wrong time of life for me. Such things happen.


Mitchell's book really is, for the most part, very good. Being on the C list, though I am supposed to read a little from this every day, most days I just have not been able to, though I have finally got through the futuristic part, which I had difficulty reading at night, and should finally be able to finish the book.


This is a low-energy post, I know. I started to go on a little about why I ultimately did not love Cloud Atlas as much as I do Dickens, and how the characters and humor, while very clever, ultimately are not as endearing to me, etc, but I didn't that was quite good enough and merited a more thorough examination, which I am not up to this evening.











Thursday, February 20, 2020

Gertrude Atherton--Black Oxen (1923)


Uploading pictures from the phone. I'm not expert at it yet.

This is, I'm thinking, one of the more currently obscure titles we've had come up on this list to date. It's yet another in the parade of American novels of the (19)20s, but it belongs to that part of the 20s that is perhaps especially forgotten now. Gertrude Atherton seems to have been a pretty popular author at the time, but she pre-dated the Lost Generation with whom that decade is largely associated now by 30-40 years. She was the same age as Theodore Roosevelt, four years older than Edith Wharton (whose old New York aristocrats appear to be the same crowd Atherton is writing about at an even later point of their development), she had thirteen years on Theodore Dreiser, who was practically considered a fossil himself at the time, 27 on Sinclair Lewis, and 41 on Hemingway. While I found a lot in this worth taking notes/commenting on, it's probably one of my least favorite so far of these IWE books. I didn't dislike it, but the main characters, who are supposed to be so brilliant, as well as the more distinguished of their companions, I found rather flat, and their dialogue tedious, which brought down the book as a whole. The IWE intro states that it "is no work of art but its characters are interesting." The premise of the story is that a 58 year old woman who had been a great beauty in her youth as well as one of the most sophisticated women in Europe gets some kind of endocrine treatment which rejuvenates her and makes her physically 28 years old again (though she is sterile), but still with her 58 year old mind, and what results when this circumstance is discovered by the New York society that she has returned to for a brief sojourn to attend to some financial interests. The idea is kind of clever but as often happens the execution does not follow through on the potential with equal cleverness.

I took so many notes on this that I'll need to prune some, but some of the passages from this seemingly lost world, once so prominent in the cultural imagination, are fascinating to me.

p.7 "All New York men of the old regime, no matter what their individuality may have been twenty years earlier, look so much alike as they approach sixty, and more particularly after they have passed it...Their moustaches and what little hair they have left turns the same shade of well-bred white. Their fine old Nordic faces are generally lean and flat of cheek, their expression calm, assured, not always smug."

This author employs the kind of extensive physiological and sartorial description, with very specific class or racial connotations (people have Norman or Saxon or Tyrolean, etc, characteristics rather than "English" or "German") that modern authors have largely dispensed with.

p. 37 "My one temptation to enter Society here would be the hope of forming a relief organization--drive, do you call it?--for the starving children of Austria. Russian children are not the only pitiable objects in Europe, and after all, the children of civilized countries are of more value to the future of the world."

This is not the last direct assertion assuming the superiority of the peoples of Northern European descent.

p. 44 "The whole country has gone crazy over youth. The most astonishingly bad books create a furore because from end-to-end they glorify post-war youth at its worst, and the stage is almost as bad"..."Yes, but they are still behind the European novelists, who find women interesting at any  age, and their intelligent readers agree with them." Clavering, the 34 year old newspaper critic/budding playwright, is supposed to be the bright coming man, most eligible bachelor in New York Society character. He is in fact more than a bit of a stuffed shirt.

One does get a nice dose of the charm of old New York, especially early in the book, such as the Madison Square scene (pp. 31-33), the leafy, lamplit, almost clean (by the standards of my lifetime) streets. "A light fall of snow lay on the grass and benches, the statues and trees of the Square. Motors were flashing and honking below and over on Fifth Avenue...Black masses were pouring toward the subways. Life!...The arcade of Madison Square Garden was already packed with men and he knew that a triple line reached down  Twenty-Sixth Street to Fourth Avenue. There was to be a prize fight tonight and the men had stood there since noon, buying apples and peanuts from peddlers." and etc.
   
Antique book barns and large multilevel stores that didn't do a lot of curating used to have walls of forgotten books from the 20s with covers like these. I think this is the first one of the type I have actually owned and read.

p. 65 Still rattling on about the rival post World War I/Lost Generation novels. "More clichés. The world was rotten to the core and the human race so filthy the wonder was that any writer would handle it with tongs. But they plunged to their necks...There had been reactions after the Civil war, but on a higher plane. The population had not been maculated by inferior races."

p.78 "After all, it had been a middle-aged man's war. Not a single military reputation had been made by any one of the millions of young fighters, despite promotions, citations, and medals. Statesmen and military men long past their youth would alone be mentioned in history."

p. 89 "Otherwise he was one of the 'black Claverings.' Northumbrian in origin and claiming descent from the Bretwaldes, overlords of Britain, the Claverings were almost as fair as their Anglian ancestors, but once in every two or three generations a completely dark member appeared, resurgence of the ancient Briton; sometimes associated with the high stature of the stronger Nordic race, occasionally--particularly among the women--almost squat." OK. Do the most respectable kinds of white Americans, especially women, still have this mentality for fine, esoteric racial consciousness? I feel like we are supposed to think there is at least some important class of them who do, but if that is the case, it seems like they would find modern society to be completely unendurable, and there is no evidence that this is a common complaint among anyone respectable or well-bred.

p. 91 "Do you think that romance is impossible in New York?' she asked irresistibly." New York has always seemed to me to be one of the few places left where romance is possible at all.

The style of writing is antiquated for its time, and does not feel "of" it. This is a problem that I think has always afflicted me as well. But since the better exemplars of the modernist style have proven so enduring, it was especially noticeable in a writer of the 1920s.

p. 124 "If the flapper should adopt a coat of arms no doubt it would be a cocktail rampant with three cigarettes argent on a field de rouge."

The flapper character is supposed to be a satire and is presented as ridiculous, but the most bearable interludes of the story were when she showed up. I thought the plot was being set up for her to marry the stiff Clavering at the end, or at least clean up her behavior a little, but after one last naughty appearance with about 100 pages left in the book, she never came back.

p. 128 Talking about the "Sophisticates" now--I'm not sure if they are supposed to be based on the Algonquin Round Table crowd or not, but I liked them too. "But their most solemn causeries were upon the vital theme of The American Reputation in Letters." I feel like this was still a big deal in my youth in the 80s. I have the sense that most of the younger generation, not having been brought up or persuaded by anyone to treat the great literatures of Europe with the degree of reverence that once prevailed here, do not view this as a pressing question in the same manner.

p. 132 Comparison of c.1920 New York with, of all places, Vienna. "...this marvelously wealthy and prosperous city where the poor were kept out of sight, at least, where all the men were whole and where one never saw a gaunt woman's appealing eyes, or emaciated ragged children." Really? What would Howard Zinn and his acolytes say to this?

I truly was not anticipating the twist explaining the mystery of the Madame Zattiany character (that she had undergone rejuvenation).



These illustrations are stills from the 1924 silent film of the book, about which I will write more later.

Chapter 28, New York intellectual/arts/theater party, circa 1920. Pretty ridiculous--a lot of self-conscious eccentricity and zany antics, though the women I found kind of appealing. Suzan Forbes?

"Miss Forbes was a tiny creature, wholly feminine in appearance...her really brilliant and initiative mind...Miss Forbes was not pretty, but she had an expressive original little face and her manners were charming...It was doubtful if she had ever been aggressive in manner or rude in her life; although she never hesitated to give utterance to the extremest of her opinions or to maintain them to the bitter end...She lit a cigarette as the music finished and pinched it into a holder nearly as long as her face. But even smoking never interfered with her pleasant, rather deprecatory, smile"...etc.

This arts scene of course is entirely white, but it's also (seemingly) entirely gentile white, which besides being unfathomable in any era pretty much after this one probably accounts for the un-self-conscious goofiness, which I don't think characters in circles like this have anymore.

p. 167 "I was very beautiful, I entertained magnificently, I was called the best-dressed woman in Paris, I was besieged by men--men who were a good deal more difficult to manage than chivalrous Americans, particularly as I was now married and the natural prey of the hunter...I learned to play the subtle and absorbing game of men and women as it is played to perfection in the older civilizations." Madame Zattiany. I admit I find people like this a little hard to take.

p. 174 Madame Zattiany again: "I thought that...I had lived too much and too hard, that my memory was overburdened and my sense of the futility and meaninglessness of life too overwhelming. (LOL emoji here)

p. 180 If rejuvenation such as Madame Zattiany's were to become widespread: "The threat of overpopulation--for man's architectonic powers were restored if not women's; to say nothing of his prolonged sojourn--would at last rouse the law-makers to the imperious necessity of eugenics, birth control, sterilization of the unfit, and the expulsion of undesirable races." The thought of eugenics frequently burst through the surface of many an WASP upper class mind in this era.

p. 213 "...he wondered if any woman, save in brief moments, could rival the ecstasy of mental creation. That rotten spot in the brain, dislocation of particles, whatever it was that enabled a few men to do what the countless millions never dreamed of attempting, or attempt only to fail, was, through its very abnormality, productive of a higher and more sustained delight, a more complete annihilation of prosaic life, than any mere function bestowed on all men alike." My God Clavering. What a stiff you are.

The literary world as depicted in this book would indicate that women were quite prominent in it at this time as writers, as I have noted before on this site, looking at the awarding of major prizes, best-seller lists and the like. There was a major shift in the 1940s and 1950s coinciding, in my opinion, with the arrival in the United States from Europe of so many deeply, almost severely learned intellectual refugees who exerted such a great influence, particularly through the universities, over what was to be considered worthwhile literature over the ensuing half-century, that had as one effect the downgrading or sidelining of much of the kind of women's writing that had garnered some recognition in the 20s. Having read some of those books for this list I wouldn't say that in most instances this downgrading or forgetting was not to some extent merited in individual cases, but I think a lot of people have the idea that women were entirely excluded from major writing and publishing opportunities before very recent times, and that does not appear to be quite true, especially during the 1910-1940 or so period, at least in the United States.

p. 230 "The world is equally astonished--and resentful--at every new discovery, but in a short time accepts it as a commonplace. The layman resents all new ideas, but the adjustment of the human mind to the inevitable is common even among savages." Is it so? I have the impression that many primitive (so-called) societies withered and died when exposed to modernity.





p. 299 "...I am not a victim of that ancient myth that two people who love each other can be happy anywhere. Environment is half the battle--for the super-civilized, at all events."

p. 301 "And there was no doubt that if you were on top, a personality, New York was the most enchanting place in the world to live in, just as it must be the most unsatisfactory for the poor and insignificant." L.O.L.

p. 315 Prince Hohenhauer, Madame Zattiany's longtime old lover, turns up in America. "He was as straight and thin as ever, his fine head erect, without haughtiness; his dark eyes under their heavy lids had the same eagle glance. he was still, she concluded dispassionately, the handsomest man she had ever seen, even for an Austrian, the handsomest race on earth..." I went on a bit of a rant as this point--I've had enough of this superior prince who is going to rule Austria, save it, make it a great and powerful republic, etc. Hasn't this guy's class just overseen the most disastrous war in human history that killed millions and brought down most of the ancient governments and ruling families in Europe? It was when they started complaining about/ridiculing the décor in a hotel in a small town in the Adirondacks that I lost it.

p. 346 "If we had met in Vienna it would never have claimed me at all. In New York one may be serious in the romantic manner when one is temporarily free from care, but seriousness is of another and a portentous quality over there." O.K., but we can concede that New York is in fact a highly romantic city after all. It is one tangible regret of mine to have never had a New York romance. I can imagine it so vividly. 


As noted above, this book almost immediately inspired a movie version, 58 minutes of which can be seen on various channels on YouTube, the Eastman restoration (which is only the first 22 minutes though) being the highest quality one I have found. The final reel of the movie is apparently missing, and no one alive that we know of--not Martin Scorcese, not Peter Bogdanovich, not anyone--has seen it. The most recognizable star of this movie to most people today would be, I assume, Clara Bow, who played Janet the flapper--like me, the filmmakers recognized that this was the liveliest character in the story, and she really is pretty sexy, her eyes especially are more than usually expressive and kind of mesmerizing. Madame Zattiany was played by Corinne Griffith, whom I had never heard of, though she was really beautiful and had a substantial career in the silent era, though only around 10 of the 58 films she made have survived--she strikes me as having been somewhat comparable to Gene Tierney in the way she is written about. She was later married to Washington Redskins owner George Preston Marshall, now notorious for his racism, and is credited with writing the lyrics to the team's celebrated fight song, "Hail to the Redskins" which is still played by the team band after every touchdown. Conway Tearle is an appropriately stiff Clavering. Alan Hale, Sr, who played Little John in the 1938 classic Robin Hood (and was the father of the skipper on Gilligan's Island) played Hohenhauer, but I assume most of his screen time comes in the lost final reel, for in the extant part he is only shown for about 5 seconds embarking from his ship onto American soil. The photo at the top of the page as well as the one directly above this paragraph at Dinwiddie's mountain lodge also evidently depict some of the lost parts of the movie, since I did not see these in the sections available online. The part of the film that I could see I thought was pretty good, even though it is difficult to watch a silent movie without music and the quality of the non-restored portion was not great. I'm always quite fascinated by film versions of books I have read that came out almost contemporaneously with the books (though this one was never remade later), I feel that they are always much closer to the spirit of the original story. The sets in this were not as lavish as I imagined the rooms and houses in the book to be, but we are still in the infancy of film history.    



The New and Improved Bourgeois Surrender Challenge

I did finally those long-contemplated tweaks to the system, and they did produce quite a few more competitors that are somewhat mass market, though the quality of the finalists does not look incredible. We will see how the tournament plays out however.

1. Robert Munsch--I Love You Forever.....................................................................10,060
2. The Ghost & Mrs Muir (movie-1947)...............................................................…..1,916
3. Philippa Gregory--The Last Tudor..........................................................................1,222
4. Dream Theater--The Astonishing (music album)................................................….1,221
5. Bill Bryson--The Body.............................................................................................1,184
6. Yangsze Choo--The Ghost Bride...........................................................................….798
7. Danielle Steel--A Good Woman...........................................................................…...633
8. Dream Theater--Distance Over Time (music album)..........................................…...620
9. Elizabeth Lev--The Tigress of Forli...........................................................................286
10. W. Michael Gear--People of the Wolf..................................................................….244
11. Linda Yellin--What Nora Knew............................................................................…130
12. W. Michael & Kathleen Gear--Sun Born...............................................................….93
13. Joanna Shupe--The Harlot Countess.....................................................................…..93
14. Maroon 5--"Memories" (song)...........................................................................…….65
15. Catherine the Great (TV-2019)..............................................................................….64
16. Catherine Chung--The Tenth Muse.....................................................................…….51
17. Lauren Slater--Lying: A Metaphorical Memoir...........................................................51

Play-in game still needed with the tie for 16th place.

#17 Slater over #16 Chung

Probably would have chosen Slater here anyway, but she is a bonus competitor here.

1st Round

#17 Slater over #1 Munsch

The Munsch book is a children's book.

#2 Ghost & Mrs Muir over #15 Catherine the Great
#3 Gregory over #14 Maroon 5
#13 Shupe over #4 Dream Theater
#5 Bryson over #12 Gears
Bryson is a past winner of the contest and while the extent of his success is puzzling to me, he is tolerably light reading late at night. Also I really do not like modern genre books at all.
#11 Yellin over #6 Choo
A tight call. Yellin is listed in the category of "Women's Divorce Fiction", which still appeal to me more than "Ghost Fiction", all else being equal.
#10 Gear over #7 Steele
#9 Lev over #8 Dream Theater
Clara Bow, you are a fox.


Quarterfinals
#17 Slater over #2 Ghost & Mrs Muir
Because books have to win. I am going to watch this movie though.
#13 Shupe over #3 Gregory
Shupe has an upset to use.
#11 Yellin over #5 Bryson
So does Yellin.
#10 Gear over #9 Lev
All of the upsets have been used up. But are there any decent books left?

Semifinals
#17 Slater over #10 Gear
It's a lot shorter.
#11 Yellin over #13 Shupe
Shupe looks basically to be almost a Harlequin romance.

Championship
#17 Slater over #11 Yellin
Either would have been OK I guess. Slater's book has the Penguin imprimatur, which makes it look more serious, though the Yellin looks a little more fun. I'm so far behind on the Challenge books, who knows when I will get there anyway.
Gertrude Atherton in her younger days.


Thursday, February 6, 2020

February 2020

A List: T. H. White--The Once and Future King...…………………….46/639
B List: Gertrude Atherton--Black Oxen...……………………………..329/346
C List: David Mitchell--Cloud Atlas...………………………………..250/509


Not quite able to finish the Atherton ahead of the monthly reporting.


The Once and Future King, which I had never read, is a rare book in that the glowing testimonials from well-known writers that adorn the cover emphasize their love for it above critical respect, awe at the author's talent, or other considerations. Ursula K. Le Guin writes "I have laughed at (White's) great Arthurian novel and cried over it and loved it all my life." Lev Grossman says "I have read this book more times than any other in my library." About fifty pages in, I have not yet found it to be quite this engrossing, though I am willing to give it some time to pick up, as there have been flashes of interesting writing. One of the blurbs described White as "a fierce and damaged man" who wrote about "fierce and damaged people", and I can see something of that. I had not imagined it was a long of a book as it is. The (paperback) edition of I got is practically a cube. I will probably be on it for a while.


Once I began Black Oxen I kind of got away from Mitchell. The "C" list book is ideally something informative or entertaining but rather light than I can read in the evening when I am tired, but Cloud Atlas is not really light. Also, while I really liked the first four sections, the fifth, set in an oppressive futuristic China (is the future ever not oppressive to artistic types?), I found harder going. Now I am in a sixth different story, which is set among what would formerly have been called primitive or untutored people in Hawaii. In this section I often lose the thread of what is going on for a page or two at a time though eventually it dawns on me and I can go back and see what was being said. I will get back on this book during the week or two interval when I am doing my report for the B list.


I've been in pretty good spirits all winter, which considering that I've had a heart attack, I don't have any time to do anything I like, I'm not allowed to eat 75% of the food I want, I don't have any money and my oldest kid is supposed to be going to college next year, and the cultural environment I grew up in is increasingly vilified or ceasing to exist, is kind of hard to explain given my usual temperament. However I went through a big depression two winters ago, when I went through the realization that I had kind of passed through the "prime" years of my life without having made much of them, when my oldest children had clearly moved past childhood into teenager-dom, that the time left me to do certain things I had always wanted to do might be running fairly short. I still have all of the same issues now, but the impact and overwhelming sense of loss has not been the same as it was then.


Pictures














Monday, January 13, 2020

Anna Sewell--Black Beauty (1877)


I have a new phone to get pictures off of, and, as I waited until I had done all of the writing for this post to add my own pictures, I could only see about a third of the article on the phone. So I added my pictures of my own book here at the top of the page.



This edition I actually found in my attic in a box of old books left behind by one of the previous inhabitants (it was an apartment house for many years). It was published by the World Publishing Company (Cleveland and New York) in 1946. The inscription reads "To 'Jimmy' from Gordon Garland. 'Happy Birthday.'"




I had finished all but nine pages of this by Christmas Eve when I had to go into the hospital for a couple of days. While I finished it once I came home everyone was on Christmas vacation and I set up in the midst of them in the living room so it was not an opportune time for writing. As I noted in the monthly report I am going to push onward with the list, though the likelihood of my living long enough to finish it seems even more improbable (now) than it did before. My condition is at least treatable, so perhaps I can make it another twenty or thirty years, barring nuclear war or other unforeseen accidents of course.




As I noted in the December update, Black Beauty is the first of these classic children's books that I've had to read that is mostly written at the actual intellectual level of a child, though it was still famous enough when I was young (I don't know about now) that I am glad to have finally read it. The IWE had this to say about our author: "Like other gentlewomen of her time she was a reformer and Black Beauty is sheer propaganda pro humane treatment of animals and, wherever possible, anti dat ole debbil alcohol. Since Miss Sewell was a spiritual cousin german to school teachers and children's librarians everywhere, her book necessarily became recommended reading and a standard children's classic; but surprisingly enough, it really is a classic and now with the horse-and-buggy era long past it is more educational than ever." So we do get a taste of some of the surprisingly bitter male chauvinism and condescension towards women of the postwar era. On the other hand, there seems to have been some culturally influential pushback against humorless scolds, who have roared back with a vengeance in our time, during that one, and I admit to being a little envious of that. Anna Sewell would be in her element today. Even though environmentalism and the rights of refugees and marginalized people were not part of her consciousness the way they are for people today the enemies of these things are pretty much the same people who were abusing horses and drinking too much in the 1800s, so you can see how the transition to the more topical subjects for outrage would not be that difficult to make.




There is a quote on page 117 that reveals a mindset that is a characteristic of our time and that has always bothered me. "Only ignorance! only ignorance! how can you talk about only ignorance? Don't you know that it is the worst thing in the world, next to wickedness?--and which does the most mischief heaven only knows. If people can say, 'Oh! I did not know, I did not mean any harm,' they think it is all right." I hate the way people use the word "ignorant" to describe others, when it should primarily be used in reference to oneself. Yes, sometimes it applies but very often it is used as an easy, but brutal, putdown where the person uttering the word is scarcely less of a moron then the person they are talking about. Its only intent is to silence someone. It is almost never used in good faith or with serious intentions to enlighten, but to stigmatize.


I'm coming off as being negative towards this book, and I did find all the righteous moralizing somewhat tiresome, but there were aspects of it that I did like. The conceit of a horse telling his own autobiography I do like, especially as the life trajectory of a 19th century horse was one of those things that had never occurred to me, that it would change owners multiple times, that the status of those owners would generally decline as it got older and less attractive, etc. It also gave a different perspective on the world of Victorian England, a period from which I have read many books, but never one quite like this one, so that is something. As far as animal biographies go, I have not read too many, but my favorite of the genre thus far is Bambi, which I think is an excellent little book even for a pretty serious adult. But it would not hurt more young people at least to read this, I don't think.








The Bourgeois Surrender Challenge

I'm going to introduce some tweaks in the next Challenge. While my current formula worked pretty well for a while, it is now giving me too many books that no one has read in a hundred years, and is repeating some of these over multiple competitions, so I have to try to liven it up.


1. Nora Roberts--Come, Sundown...……………………………………...2,640
2. Michael Morpurgo--War Horse……………………………………………..898
3. Jaimy Gordon--Lord of Misrule...………………………………………...97
4. Arthur Conan Doyle--Return of Sherlock Holmes...……………………...60
5. D. H. Lawrence--The Rainbow...………………………………………….54
6. Stanley Gordon West--Amos: To Ride a Dead Horse...…………………..32
7. Ralph Henry Barbour--Follow the Ball...…………………………………..0
8. Irving Bacheller--The Turning of Griggsby………………………………...0
9. Reuben Okorie--Shifting Sands...…………………………………………..0
10. Louis Boudin--The Socialist Empire: The Incas of Peru...……………….0
11. Sir Walter Besant--London in the Time of the Stuarts...…………………..0
12. Anonymous--London and its Environs...………………………………….0
13. The XYZs of Socialism (ed. Reed)…………………………………………0
14. Pablo Picasso, et al--Chevaux de Minuit...………………………………...0
15. Jackson Gregory--Lonely Trail...…………………………………………..0
16. Robert W. Gordon--Taming the Past...……………………………………0


1st Round


I feel like I should have a preliminary round just for all the 0-scorers, but as there are so many in this game and I am going to be fiddling with the format going forward, I will just do this one as a straight tournament. At the same time the extremely useful state library catalog which I have used throughout these tournaments is currently inaccessible, which further messes everything up as I play these games.


#16 Gordon over #1 Roberts
#15 Gregory over #2 Morpurgo
#3 Gordon over #14 Picasso
#4 Doyle over #13 Socialism
#5 Lawrence over #12 Anonymous
#6 West over #11 Besant
#7 Barbour over #10 Boudin


This the 3rd time recently that this particular Boudin book has qualified for the tournament. It seems unlikely that this would happen randomly.


#8 Bacheller over #9 Okorie


Round of 8
#3 J. Gordon over #16 R. Gordon
#4 Doyle over #15 Gregory
#5 Lawrence over #8 Bacheller
#6 West over #7 Barbour


Final 4
#6 West over #3 J. Gordon


A close game. Similar enough books that the choice is kind of random.


#4 Doyle over #5 Lawrence


This one was close too. Two IWE authors, both pretty long books. I have read The Rainbow before.


Championship
#6 West over #4 Doyle


Because it is much shorter.


Anna Sewell's house in Great Yarmouth, England.

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

January 2020

A List: Steinbeck--The Grapes of Wrath...……………………………...220/455
B List: In-between
C List: David Mitchell--Cloud Atlas...…………………………………...89/509


Yesterday was my 50th birthday. Not sure how many more I am going to get, but I figure I might as well keep plugging away at the lists. I was ill over the holidays so I didn't get much reading done this month.


This is the second Steinbeck book (along with East of Eden) that I have taken up in recent years, and while I don't like Grapes of Wrath quite as much because of, I regret to admit, the lower class milieu which informs the dialogue, it is undoubtedly the defining literary document of the Depression-era United States as far as the collective imagination goes. I cannot at the moment think of anything else that really comes close as far as emphasizing the psychic misery particular to that time period. Its emotional power is real, which I like.


This Mitchell book, which I think of as super-up-to-date, is actually already 16 years old. I anticipated it was going to be a Pynchon or Will Self kind of book that was ungodly clever but rather a chore to read and I was planning to dutifully get through 100 pages or so and give it up. But so far I have to confess it is quite readable, and clever, yes, but not in a zany, eccentric way, but the erudite English way that I suspect many of us who read books feel that we could have been if we had grown up in the right environment and been properly educated. At the very least it is calculated so far to appeal to many of my weak points, especially the Zedelghem part. Mitchell himself is around my age (along with Knausgaard) and when I was younger and in the process of failing to become anything that I wanted to become I was angry whenever anybody who seemed somewhat similar to me was able to succeed, though now that people my age are starting to die all around me and I've perhaps nearly died myself I'm kind of softening and letting it go.


I also managed to read Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut during this period also. People either like him or they don't. I do think he is funny, so I like him. The first half of this book I thought was great. I felt like the story kind of got away from him once Papa dies and the ice-nine got loose. At least I didn't like it as much.